![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which raises an interesting question about focusing more effort on
making an airplane that is simpler to fly. Which is very doable - it merely requires that we give up some of our cherished concepts about what the right way is. Some thoughts: Forget rudder pedals. Forget slips. Crosswind landings are made by crabbing all the way down, then plopping the plane on the runway by chopping the throttle. The gear will take it. It worked fine on the Ercoupe, and it would work fine on a Cherokee. I've seen the way students land those things in a crosswind - if they can take that, they can take anything. We can make it more effective by adding spoilers on the wings. They activate when the throttle is pulled all the way out. They also simplify glideslope control. Navigation? What a waste of time. Every plane would have the equivalent of a Garmin 396 (its failure would be considered an emergency condition warranting a call to ATC for emergency handling) and everyone would just follow the purple lines. VOR? NDB? DME? Dead reckoning? Pilotage??? You gotta be kidding. Weather? Why? That 396 has a satellite downlink. A little reprogramming, and it will simply shade areas of the screed green (for safe), yellow (for caution), or red (for hazardous) and you reroute yourself. METAR? TAF? You gotta be kidding. Engine failure? How often does that happen anyway? And if it does - hey, let's just equip the planes with parachutes. If you can't get it restarted by 2000 ft, pull the handle. Ground reference maneuvers? Patterns? WHY? That 396 will zoom in on the airport and guide you into a pattern entry. After all, it already knows the winds and the traffic pattern direction. We can add skywatch, and then it will even sequence you in with the traffic. No transponder in the aircraft? Those guys are a hazard, shouldn't be allowed. With modern technology, it would be no problem to design and build airplanes that any idiot could learn to fly in a weekend, never mind a week. We wouldn't get the Harley crowd that way, but we might well get the Mercedes crowd. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
no RPM drop on mag check | Dave Butler | Owning | 19 | November 2nd 04 02:55 AM |
Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 02:20 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |