![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul J. Adam
Built Up Areas, we aren't necessarily just fighting there) which means a lot of voice communication: it's hard enough to hear shouted commands from downstairs or around a corner as is, without ear plugs in place. So, you risk ringing ears and partial HF deafness later on, in order to keep control of your fireteam during the action. Why on Earth aren't active (electronic) ear mufflers used nowadays? Like many hunters and shooters have done for quite some time. Such mufflers are rather expensive, of course, and I can understand that poor armies, resistance fighters and such can't afford them. But to hi-tech armies that actually are currently engaged in FIBUA, like the US one, damaging the hearing of its soldiers seems much less affordable than getting another piece of fancy kit. And it's not just about hearing protection. A soldier with his ears ringing after eg fireing his weapon within a confined space without hearing protection, will have immediately, but temporarily, much degraded hearing. And a soldier subject to a very loud noise, like a nearby explosion, may loose his hearing immediately and completely for some time. Thus, I'd assume that active mufflers would enhance the ability to sustain FIBUA, much for the same reasons that non-active hearing protection, like simple plugs, might impair the ability to do FIBUA, at least initially, ie before the soldiers being subject to damaging noise levels. Moreover, shouldn't practically all modern military helmets be designed to be compatible with low-profile ear cups, and vice versa? So why not use them? Not only do electronic ear mufflers allow non-damaging sounds to pass, but the amplification can be adjusted, so that quiet sounds are enhanced. Coupled to a directonal microphone (and especially with a parabolic antenna), even very quiet sounds can be heard over considerable distances, which could sometimes, in special circumstances, be useful. Plugging one's radio output to the ear muffs, the voice com will be much easier to hear in a noisy environment, as the mufflers can be used to cut the background noise. In a quiet environment, stealthiness might improve slightly too, as even less received voice com would escape the muffs than a simple unshielded head-set. Or is there somehting that I miss? Is, after all, some essential information lost when the sound passes through the artificial, but hopefully hi-fi, electronics before reaching the ear? The muffs do conserve stereophonic (directional) info of course, but is there eg problems due to the disparity between the artificial sound from the muffs vs the sound propagating through the bones? That one can't adapt to with training? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Maybe GWB isn't lying....... | JD | Military Aviation | 26 | February 5th 04 12:35 AM |
Czechoslovak nuclear weapons? Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 25 | January 17th 04 02:18 PM |
please stop bashing France | Grantland | Military Aviation | 233 | October 29th 03 01:23 AM |
What about the AIM-54 Pheonix Missile? | Flub | Military Aviation | 26 | October 5th 03 05:34 AM |
Laser simulator provides weapons training | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 28th 03 09:58 PM |