![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There certainly are good ideas out there for changing our civil
liability system, but doing anything about punitive damages is not likely to change anything. Punitive damages are awarded in less than 5% of the cases where plaintiff wins (which means it's an even smaller percentage of all cases) and the median punitive damage award is $50,000. Hardly "enormous". Do you wonder why large punitive damages are so newsworthy? It's because they are so rare. I do think some modification of the second part of your idea would be a good thing. On Sun, 09 May 2004 16:55:31 GMT, David Megginson wrote: zip wrote: Do you know why ultralight piilots are flying Rotax two strokes? Because the company that makes them has NO assets in the USA, liniting the damage that can be done to them by silly lawsuits. Same with motorcycle helmets, there are NO manufacturers wuth assets in the U.S. Want to save american jobs? Stop frivolous profit oriented lawsuits. It's an easy problem to fix, if you American voters cared enough to make it an election issue: just revise the law so that punitive damages in a law suite go to the government instead of the plaintiff. For example, if I get injured by someone, and the judge and jury determine that my injuries are worth 500K plus legal costs, then I get 500K plus legal costs. If they also decide to award 50M punitive damages to teach the defendant a lesson, that money should go to the government like any other fine would. If lawyers cannot hope for a cut of the (enormous) punitive damages, they'll be less likely to take on trivial litigation. Another alternative is the system that we have here in Canada (and, I think, in the U.K. and other Commonwealth countries, though I'm not sure). The loser in a civil case normally pays the winner's costs, so I'm not about to go out and sue Lycoming or Piper unless I'm pretty sure I'll win: otherwise, they might send me a bill for millions in legal expenses. That one might not go over so well, though, since it discourages people from suing even when they do have a legitimate case. All the best, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1913 Aero & Hydro Magazine | barry | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 19th 04 10:39 PM |
Shop Layout Questions | GreenPilot | Home Built | 37 | July 6th 04 02:47 PM |
Things I Have Learned As First Time Buyer/Owner (long) | MRQB | Owning | 12 | April 19th 04 02:12 PM |
Avionics Shop Is Done Nice Sticker In My Log Book Total Costs | MRQB | Owning | 0 | April 3rd 04 08:21 AM |
Q re Instrument lighting upgrade by Aero Enhancement: anyone with experience? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 07:37 PM |