![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barry" wrote in
: Actually, there are a lot of anomolies around the world. Eastern Europe and Russia doggedly cling to using windspeed in Meters/second and have reluctantly accepted using feet for altitude, though there are still a lot of published platform altitudes of something like "2746 feet" I learned to fly in France in the 1980s and they used a weird combination of feet and meters. Altimeters read in feet,and minimum safe altitudes were charted in feet. But charted obstructions and airspace restrictions were in meters. Everyone set QFE (altimeter reads zero on the ground) for takeoff, then reset the altimeter to QNH if leaving the traffic pattern. Flight levels began at 3500 feet. Can any Europeans out there tell me if it's still like that? I fly in Eurpoe a lot an dmercifully tht doesn't seem to be the case, but having said that, I only use insturment charts in France... Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I learned to fly in France in the 1980s and they used a weird
combination of feet and meters. Altimeters read in feet,and minimum safe altitudes were charted in feet. But charted obstructions and airspace restrictions were in meters. Everyone set QFE (altimeter reads zero on the ground) for takeoff, then reset the altimeter to QNH if leaving the traffic pattern. Flight levels began at 3500 feet. Can any Europeans out there tell me if it's still like that? I fly in Eurpoe a lot an dmercifully tht doesn't seem to be the case, but having said that, I only use insturment charts in France... Does the ATIS give both QNH and QFE? I flew mainly from an airport with a tower and no ATIS. If you told ground you were staying in the pattern they gave you just the QFE, otherwise they gave both. And the VFR airport charts gave the difference between QNH and QFE (in hPa) for each airport, along with the field elevation in both meters and feet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barry" wrote in
: I learned to fly in France in the 1980s and they used a weird combination of feet and meters. Altimeters read in feet,and minimum safe altitudes were charted in feet. But charted obstructions and airspace restrictions were in meters. Everyone set QFE (altimeter reads zero on the ground) for takeoff, then reset the altimeter to QNH if leaving the traffic pattern. Flight levels began at 3500 feet. Can any Europeans out there tell me if it's still like that? I fly in Eurpoe a lot an dmercifully tht doesn't seem to be the case, but having said that, I only use insturment charts in France... Does the ATIS give both QNH and QFE? I flew mainly from an airport with a tower and no ATIS. If you told ground you were staying in the pattern they gave you just the QFE, otherwise they gave both. And the VFR airport charts gave the difference between QNH and QFE (in hPa) for each airport, along with the field elevation in both meters and feet. Now you mention it, some plaes in France do also include the QFE. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for TSO Altimeter | Rob Turk | Home Built | 0 | June 9th 07 03:52 PM |
Altimeter off | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | March 26th 07 12:11 PM |
Altimeter discrepancy | Gene Whitt | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 1st 05 07:11 PM |
ATC Altimeter Settings | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | April 11th 05 08:07 PM |
Altimeter Disassembly | Dick | Home Built | 3 | April 2nd 05 01:27 PM |