![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-5, Darryl Ramm wrote:
There is no excuse for a USA based manufacturer to be developing an ADS-B receiver today that is not dual-band/link layer. On Dec 17, 2015, Bad Elf announced what they're calling a dual band receiver. Does this address your dual band concerns? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects.../posts/1447126 The price went up to $549 on the dual band model, but it now claims to include non-toy AHRS and a rudimentary Flight Data Recorder. I'm not saying that this is legit, but it is interesting. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/20/15 5:31 AM, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-5, Darryl Ramm wrote: There is no excuse for a USA based manufacturer to be developing an ADS-B receiver today that is not dual-band/link layer. On Dec 17, 2015, Bad Elf announced what they're calling a dual band receiver. Does this address your dual band concerns? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects.../posts/1447126 The price went up to $549 on the dual band model, but it now claims to include non-toy AHRS and a rudimentary Flight Data Recorder. I'm not saying that this is legit, but it is interesting. Yes, indeed that solves the dual-link issue I have. Thanks for pointing that out. But it kind of ruined the point of having a good long rant... :-) But still I am far from impressed with their "oh we wanted to bring a weather and AHRS product to market first"... uh bull**** they *were* positioning it as a ADS-B traffic solution. Yes if you dug int the details they warned that you needed ADS-B Out for ADS-R via the FAA ground stations to give you 1090ES traffic data. But still there is no excuse in my books for companies to screw around with new products that are single link only receivers. Just a very very bad idea. I do believe this is a legitimate attempt to do a crowdfunded device, and BadElf has delivered nice GPS products before. I'm not questioning them on any of that. The question remains why not just buy a Garmin GDL39 or GLD39-3D (with AHRS) or Status S2? Especially compared to funding a much riskier kickstarter project for a somewhat cheaper ($549 vs. ~$900) me-too product, vs. buying from very well established current vendors. We'll see if they even get funded (they want $500k). Some even preliminary specs like battery technology/life etc. seem to be not available. It is a small sample size but effectively everybody I know who is flying GA aircraft with portable ADS-B In is using a Stratus. I hope they are all Stratus S2 (i.e. dual-link), but I'm not sure. That is largely driven by the popularity of Foreflight software and their bundling with Status. OTOH personally much more interesting to me is the Rasberry Pi Stratux mentioned here by Bill. (Note the dig at Appareo Stratus). That's a great hacking platform for technical folks to play with and understand ADS-B, the latest of several software defined radio projects (mostly for 1090ES In), but probably the most flexible. Not of any interest to me to actually want folks to fly with... but interesting for folks who want to play/understand ADS-B, set up ground receivers/trackers, etc. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mods to glider = experimental? | Bret | Soaring | 3 | June 16th 10 09:29 PM |
New Trig TT22 Transponder | Paul Remde | Soaring | 1 | January 14th 10 07:27 PM |
Trig TT21 in Experimental Aircraft | Paul Remde | Soaring | 5 | July 5th 09 03:15 AM |
Licensing new Experimental glider in USA | John Bojack[_2_] | Soaring | 5 | January 2nd 09 01:54 PM |
USA Glider Experimental Airworthiness Certificate | charlie foxtrot | Soaring | 4 | April 15th 06 05:04 AM |